Here is a brief comparison between capabilities of Nokia Lumia 920 and Nokia 808 PureView, "as such" from Twitter. It should answer major queries among users. This one is in Damian Dinning's own words. Follow on...
" 1. In situations where camera movement is not an issue 808 will provide more detailed images with less noise due to oversampling where camera movement is evident for either stills (typically low light) or videos 920 will be better due to OIS
2. In low light if devices are handheld and used in auto 920 will be better due to OIS - no blur and brighter images. If 808 is used in night mode or manual ISO allowing speeds to 2.7secs and supported it will provide better images due to oversampling
3. In video, for most people, due to OIS you'll get smoother looking videos with 920. 808 however in video does provide lossless zoom oversampling due to high res sensor
4. In terms of audio recording, the difference is mono in the 920 vs 808 which is stereo.
5. 808 due to high res sensor has lossless zoom in stills and as already mentioned also in video.
6. 920 thanks to the new capabilities of the Windows Phone 8 platform can use 'lens' apps. This allows greater extension of the camera capabilities. You'll see this at launch with some cool lenses from Nokia such as Smart Shoot and Cinemagraph, with more to come in the future. We're VERY excited about some of those we have in the pipeline
I think that covers the main differences people are interested in. Note: These are based on launch SW and are intended as a general summary and that actual side by side comparisons of course will be required to see specific differences important to you personally. As a summary, PureView is industry leading imaging technology designed to make a real difference. "
-Damian Dinning
Everything is self explanatory. Some pluses and some minuses, but over all win by Lumia 920...
Source
Posts
0 comments:
Post a Comment